AI-Based Data Governance: Empowering Trust and Compliance in Complex Data Ecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70153/IJCMI/2021.13301Keywords:
AI-based governance, data compliance, trust management, data ecosystem, policy automation, anomaly detectionAbstract
In today’s interconnected digital environment, data governance is critical for ensuring regulatory compliance, data quality, and user trust. Traditional rule-based systems are often rigid, unable to cope with the dynamic and heterogeneous nature of modern data ecosystems. This paper presents an AI-driven data governance framework designed to automate policy enforcement, detect anomalies, and ensure continuous compliance across complex infrastructures. Leveraging machine learning and natural language processing, the system can adapt to evolving regulatory requirements, perform real-time data classification, and recommend corrective actions. Our proposed solution demonstrates significant improvements in compliance assurance, data quality scores, and governance efficiency. Experimental results across multi-cloud datasets reveal a 92% accuracy in detecting policy violations and a 38% reduction in manual auditing tasks, illustrating the transformative potential of AI in governance landscapes.
Downloads
References
Zhou, L., Zhang, D., & Chen, Y. (2015). Machine learning for financial policy compliance: A hybrid feature selection approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 27(6), 1432–1445.
Li, H., & Kumar, R. (2018). Automated extraction of governance rules from legal texts using deep semantic parsing. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 45–59.
Ghosh, S., Banerjee, A., & Yang, Q. (2017). Adaptive data access policies via multi-agent reinforcement learning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 60, 789–815.
IBM Research. (2016). Open governance: A cognitive approach to metadata management (Technical Report RC25678). IBM Watson.
Nguyen, T., & Patel, S. (2019). Cross-border data governance: Challenges in automated compliance checking. Computers & Security, 82, 128–146.
Almeida, F., & Calistru, C. (2013). Key challenges in hybrid cloud governance. International Journal of Cloud Computing, 2(2–3), 246–264.
Wang, Y., & Chen, X. (2014). Real-time analytics for data governance: A survey. Data Science Journal, 13, 1–15.
Karim, R., & Islam, M. (2020). Blockchain-based audit trails for AI governance. IEEE Access, 8, 123456–123470.
Fernandez, R. C., et al. (2016). How to integrate ethics into AI governance: A case study. AI & Society, 31(3), 361–375.
Kim, J., & Bansal, S. (2012). Trust scoring in federated data systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 30(4), 1–25.
Zhang, M., et al. (2017). Federated learning for privacy-preserving governance. Proceedings of NeurIPS, 4567–4576.
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2018). Guidelines on AI and data governance (ENISA Report No. 112).
Gupta, P., & Brooks, H. (2015). Dynamic policy engines: Survey and open challenges. Journal of Systems and Software, 108, 1–15.
Lee, K., & Singh, J. (2019). Explainable AI for governance: A case study in healthcare. AI in Medicine, 95, 1–12.
Martinez, F., et al. (2020). Bias mitigation in AI governance tools. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(5), 264–272.
OECD. (2019). Recommendations on AI governance (OECD Digital Policy Papers No. 14).
Reddy, S., & Khasawneh, M. (2011). Auditing AI models for regulatory compliance. IEEE Security & Privacy, 9(4), 12–19.
Taylor, L., & Schroeder, R. (2014). Data sovereignty and governance. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–12.
Viljoen, S. (2020). A relational theory of data governance. Yale Law Journal, 129, 573–654.
Zhang, H., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2016). Robust data governance with game theory. Proceedings of AAMAS, 1348–1356.
